Showing posts with label change management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change management. Show all posts

Monday, 2 September 2013

Using ambiguity, complexity and effective communication to stop organisational meltdown - http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-change-management-consultants/using-ambiguity-complexity-and-effective-communication-to-stop-organisational-meltdown/

http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-change-management-consultants/using-ambiguity-complexity-and-effective-communication-to-stop-organisational-meltdown/


Change ManagementUsing ambiguity, complexity and effective communication to stop organisational meltdown: introducing the Helix of Change™.


 


From Robert J Toogood, Senior Partner – Chaordic Solutions:


When the world changes faster than people are able to adapt to it then this is when something called chaotic change can take over … and if left unmanaged, can result in organisational meltdown and ultimately, failure.  However, whilst this form of chaos brings uneasiness, it can also be used as a powerful catalyst for creativity and growth.


Introducing the Helix of Change™


Several years ago, we started to research one aspect of how change occurs within nature and how this relates to what happens in organisations.


You may already know that at the very centre of growth within the natural world is something called the Helix of Life aka DNA.   The Helix of Life is a complicated structure … consisting of two long chains of molecular building blocks called nucleotides, twisted into a double helix and joined by things called hydrogen bonds.


ppm4If we use this analogy for describing chaotic change then our view is that one long chain of the double helix could represent ambiguity and the other complexity, with effective communication as the equivalent of the hydrogen bonds that keep the structure together.  We referred to this at the time as the Helix of Change™.


In the natural world, when allowed to operate healthily, all is well and the life form is able to survive.  However, if the hydrogen bonds fail or get damaged, the organism dies.


So it is in organisations … effective communication is essential for our survival and if this fails, then ambiguity and complexity get out of control resulting in chaotic change which if left unmanaged, can result in organisational meltdown and ultimately, failure.


The American writer Henry Adams (1838-1918) once said that “Chaos often breeds life, when order breeds habit”.  So for some time now, a degree of chaos within an organisation has been recognised as potentially healthy and possibly, even desirable.


Indeed, chaos can sometimes develop as a result of management’s own attempts to use creative tension within the organisation to create a shared vision as advocated many years ago by Peter Senge in The Fifth Discipline.  “A shared vision provides a compass to keep learning on course when stress develops”, Senge says.  In addition, “The gap between vision and current reality is also a source of energy.  If there were no gap, there would be no need for any action to move towards the vision”.  The gap created is referred to creative tension and it is this, which can create a degree of positive chaos on a temporary basis whilst order is being restored and directed towards achieving the shared vision.


Over the coming months, we will share our active research activities into this relationship between ambiguity, complexity and effective communication …. and organisational culture; our specific focus is exploring how they can be used to positively influence critical activities like governance, risk and compliance … by winning those “hearts and minds” that are so important for making sure the right things happen, at the right time and in the right place!

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

Introducing our RESCUE service for projects, portfolios and programmes - http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-programme-and-project-management-consultants/introducing-our-rescue-service-for-projects-portfolios-and-programmes/

http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-programme-and-project-management-consultants/introducing-our-rescue-service-for-projects-portfolios-and-programmes/


programmemanagementIn a previous post, we talked about the different ways in which our Senior Partner, Robert J Toogood, can help you and your organisation.


In this post, we focus in more detail on how Robert can help you RESCUE a project, portfolio or programme or some other form of strategic implementation initiative that is failing to deliver on expectations.


SERVICE FOCUS


Robert particularly enjoys the very special and motivating challenge associated with RESCUE activities, which quite often is associated with restoring order to what sometimes appears as being chaos.


CASE STUDY


On this RESCUE assignment for a client in the Business Services – Office Products sector, they wanted help with rescuing a programme that was part of a “greenfield site” set of developments that included the setting up of a new Head Office and fully automated Distribution Centre, one of the most advanced in Europe at that time.


Robert worked with the IT Director to help manage the implementation of associated changes into the initial site. This involved working with a diverse team consisting of both Client and third party staff. During the implementation, the third party software vendor chosen by the Client ceased trading in the UK so additional issues and constraints had to be successfully resolved.


He made a difference by being able to leverage his extensive change management experience to complement that of the Client to support successful delivery of programme objectives.


TESTIMONIAL


The Client subsequently commented that Robert:


“Made a major personal contribution to the success of the project and has shown a high level of commitment and dedication throughout.”


NEXT STEPS


So if you have a project, portfolio or programme or some other form of strategic implementation initiative that is failing to deliver on expectations, then Robert might be that safe pair of hands you have been looking for to RESCUE it.  Contact him NOW on +44 (0)1983 617241 or at robert_toogood@chaordicsolutions.com to schedule some time to discuss your immediate challenges … on a strictly confidential and non-obligation basis


More … www.robertjtoogood.com … this site is best viewed from a laptop or desktop as it is not currently optimised for mobile viewing.

Monday, 25 February 2013

Mounting evidence we all possess inherent bias against creativity - http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-change-management-consultants/mounting-evidence-we-all-possess-inherent-bias-against-creativity/

http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-change-management-consultants/mounting-evidence-we-all-possess-inherent-bias-against-creativity/

Change ManagementMounting evidence we all possess inherent bias against creativity: however there are ways of addressing this.

 

Extract from TEDTalk – David Burkus:

Have you ever debuted an exciting new idea to the world only to receive a lukewarm or even highly critical response? Well, get used to it. Mounting evidence shows that we all possess an inherent bias against creativity. David Burkus shares the good news that there actually is something we can do about it:

http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/Why-Great-Ideas-Get-Rejected-Da

David Burkus is Assistant Professor of Management at Oral Roberts University where he teaches courses on creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship and organizational behavior. He is the founder and editor of LDRLB, an online think tank that shares insights from research on leadership, innovation, and strategy. He is the author of the forthcoming book Myths of Creativity to be published in Fall 2013.

More … http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/Why-Great-Ideas-Get-Rejected-Da

Thursday, 31 January 2013

Helping your team to win and deliver strategy - http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-strategy-implementation-consultants/helping-your-team-to-win-and-deliver-strategy/

http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-strategy-implementation-consultants/helping-your-team-to-win-and-deliver-strategy/

portfoliomanagementminiHelping your team to win and deliver strategy: importance of focus, leverage, engagement, accountability disciplines.

 

Extract from Forbes - Chris McChesney and Jim Huling:

It’s likely that by now you’ve put the finishing touches on your strategy for 2013. And if you’re like most leaders, by now you’ve fallen in love with your vision for the year—goals achieved, teams engaged, customers delighted, and success rewarded.

While this vision plays in your head like a Spielberg movie, we want to echo sobering advice from a former heavyweight champion: “Everyone has a fight plan until they get hit in the face.”

The vast majority of leaders, 80% in one recent study, will fail to achieve the strategy they have laid out for their teams, and for most it won’t be because of any flaw in their planning.

After working with thousands of leaders and teams in every kind of industry, and in schools and government agencies worldwide, this is what we have learned: Your biggest challenge isn’t deciding what to do. Your biggest challenge is getting people to execute it at the level of excellence you need.

Our experience has shown there are four primary reasons teams fail to execute:

1. They have too many important goals. Basically, the more you try to do, the less you actually accomplish. If you’re currently trying to execute five, 10, or even 20 important goals above the day-to-day operation, the truth is that your team can’t focus. That’s why your first challenge is focusing on one (or, at the most, two) wildly important goals, instead of trying to significantly improve everything all at once.  This is the discipline of focus.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally recently said it best: “You just can’t be world class on 97 different things.” Focus is a natural principle. The sun’s scattered rays are too weak to start a fire, but once you focus them with a magnifying glass they bring paper to flame in seconds. The same is true of human beings. Once their collective energy is focused on a challenge, there is little they can’t accomplish.

2. They hope for good lag measures (outcomes) instead of driving lead measures (behaviors). Lag measures are the tracking measurements of the wildly important goal, and they are usually the ones you spend most of your time hoping for. Revenue, profit, market share, and customer satisfaction are all lag measures, meaning that when you receive them, the performance that drove them is already in the past. That’s why you’re hoping. By the time you get a lag measure, you can’t fix it. It’s history.

Lead measures are quite different. They are the measures of the most high-impact things your team must do to reach the goal. In essence, they measure the new behaviors that will drive success on the lag measures, whether those behaviors are as simple as offering a sample to every customer in the bakery or as complex as adhering to standards in jet-engine design. This is the discipline of leverage.

Simply put, all actions are not created equal. Some have more leverage than others when you’re reaching for a goal. And it is those that you want to identify and act on.

3. They have a scoreboard designed for the leaders, not the players. People play differently when they’re keeping score. However, the truth of this statement is more clearly revealed by a change in emphasis: People play differently when they are keeping score. It’s not about you keeping score for them.

This is the discipline of engagement. The kind of scoreboard that will drive the highest levels of engagement with your team will be one that is designed solely for (and often by) the players. This players’ scoreboard is quite different from the complex coach’s scoreboard that leaders love to create. It must be simple, so simple that members of the team can determine instantly if they are winning or losing.

The highest level of performance always comes from people who are emotionally engaged, and the highest level of engagement comes from knowing the score—that is, knowing whether one is winning or losing. If your team members don’t know whether they are winning the game, they are probably on their way to losing.

4. They don’t hold one another accountable. Most teams view accountability as reactive and negative. If you say, “Come see me in an hour; we need to have an accountability session,” they can be fairly certain it’s not a good thing.

But what we’re describing here is a particular kind of accountability, the accountability that is created when a team actively meets every week to answer the question “Did we do what we committed to one another we would do?” When the answer is yes, when members of a team see their peers consistently following through on the commitments they make, they grow in respect for one another. They learn that the people they work with can be trusted to follow through. When this happens, performance improves dramatically.

Your team wants to win. They want to make a contribution that matters. However, many lack discipline, the disciplines of focus, leverage, engagement, and accountability that drive how a team executes. Bring these disciplines to the execution of your 2013 strategy, and your team not only will have the experience of winning on a key goal, they will become a winning team.

This article is by Chris McChesney and Jim Huling. Chris McChesney is global practice leader, execution practice, and Jim Huling is a managing consultant, for FranklinCovey. They coauthored The 4 Disciplines of Execution:  Achieving Your Wildly Important Goals.

More … http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2013/01/25/four-reasons-why-your-2013-strategy-will-fail/?

Friday, 11 January 2013

http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-business-transformation-consultants/boosting-innovation-effectiveness-by-embracing-risk/ Boost innovation effectiveness by embracing risk: creates confidence that efforts well paced and risks well managed.   Extract from Corporate Risk & Insurance: Accenture Risk Management’s Steve Culp and Wouter Koetzier have explored the benefits of a closure connection between...

http://www.chaordicsolutions.co.uk/blog/from-our-business-transformation-consultants/boosting-innovation-effectiveness-by-embracing-risk/ Boost innovation effectiveness by embracing risk: creates confidence that efforts well paced and risks well managed.   Extract from Corporate Risk & Insurance: Accenture Risk Management’s Steve Culp and Wouter Koetzier have explored the benefits of a closure connection between...

Wednesday, 9 January 2013

Fundamental changes needed in business conversations

Change ManagementFundamental changes needed in business conversations: must have courage to change way we converse and do business.

 

Extracts from VCO Global Website - John Niland and Kate Daly:

Everyone’s marketplace is changing.  This creates an obvious need for fresh thinking and agile processes.  We all need new routes to market, innovative use of technology, collaboration and real results.

Every day we hear about the importance of building relationships: it’s constantly mentioned and tweeted.  But are we having the right conversations?  Are we engaging and connecting with people or just continuing to broadcast dull messages through an exciting technology-driven medium?  It’s no longer good enough to be a good communicator or techno-savvy.  Courage is fundamental to success.  Without the courage to make requests and ask vital questions, good ideas remain the world’s best kept secrets.

But what about your dialogue skills?  Is your conversation keeping pace?  Or are your meetings spent in longwinded exchanges of information, slogging through over-engineered agendas, hasty box-ticking exercises… or just plain boring?

Here are just a few of the conversations that VCO Global Clients suggest are no longer working:

1. Solution Selling: buyers are no longer willing to grant briefing time / info that they see to be in the seller’s interest

2. Annual Reviews: formulaic exercises, peppered with superficial assessments, often dreaded by both parties

3. Target/Goal Setting: used to extract more for less, devoid of real understanding, robbing jobs of meaning, etc.

Better conversations take courage and skill.  Here are some examples of the vital skills needed in the new economy:

1. Reframing Requirements – why it’s no longer sufficient to understand requirements, how we need to reframe and hence set the agenda;

2. Influencing your Annual Review – a few simple steps that make a real difference to this vital discussion;

3. The Courage to Ask - one of the recurring challenges in the current climate is that of asking for what we need… and keep asking;

4. Developing Opportunity in the Current Climate - developing an opportunity-mindset.

These are just examples. The clients with whom VCO Global works are already articulate in defining their own specific needs: in sales, management, or supporting key people who are vital for the future of the enterprise.

In the recently published book, “The Courage To Ask“, John Niland and Kate Daly from VCO Global outline some fundamental changes to business conversations and invites us to test how courageous we are in changing the way we converse and do business.  Using five characters, John and Kate illustrate how we can build courage through the seven gateways of Connection, Purpose, Influential Communications, Awareness, Discipline, Curiosity and Stamina.  The book combines psychological insight with identifiable, warm characters and provides a sharp and insightful view of the changing world in business.

Courage should be the foundation for all your activities: without it you’re unlikely to be able to implement suggestions offered elsewhere.  If connecting, influencing and communicating is the lifeblood of your business and the work you do, then  ”The Courage To Ask“ will be the most  important book you read this year.

More … http://www.vco-global.com/

Tuesday, 8 January 2013

Increased recognition of influence culture has on management of risk

businesscontinuityminiIncreased recognition of influence culture has on management of risk: practical guidance and insights now available.

 

From Robert J Toogood, Senior Partner – Chaordic Solutions:

In recent months, there has been increased recognition of the importance and part that Culture has on the effective management of Risk within an organisation.

It is of particular interesting to see that the Institute of Risk Management (IRM) has recently published its own board guidance on Risk Culture.  As Richard Anderson, IRM Chairman, states in their introductory Risk Culture paperProblems with risk culture are often blamed for organisational difficulties but, until now, there was very little practical advice around on what to do about it.”

So what is this thing we call Risk Culture?

The IRM definition is:

“Risk culture is a term describing the values, beliefs, knowledge and understanding about risk shared by a group of people with a common purpose, in particular the employees of an organisation or of teams or groups within an organisation. This applies whether the organisations are private companies, public bodies or not-for-profits and wherever they are in the world.”

Anderson goes on to say “This paper seeks to give guidance in this area, drawing upon the wealth of practical experience and expert knowledge across the Institute. It aims to provide advice to organisations wanting greater understanding of their own risk cultures and to give them some practical tools that they can then use to drive change.   This short document summarises our approach to risk culture for those working at board level.  There is also a longer companion document – Risk Culture: Resources for Practitioners – which covers the detailed thinking behind the concepts and models that we have found to be useful.  This remains a developing area and we do not consider that we have written the last word on the subject – we expect to see more models and tools and in particular sector and issue-specific work emerging in the future.”

But the IRM is not the only organisation currently looking at the impact of Culture on Risk.  The Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation (CARR) and the University of Plymouth has recently published an interim report entitled Risk Culture in Financial Organisations”, which explores the issue of how financial institutions are increasingly investing in programmes to understand and manage their risk cultures.  It is of particular interest to read in this report that that despite almost universal agreement that the organisational risk culture of banks and other financial institutions (BOFIs) played a major role in the global financial crisis, the research has found that there is still no clear consensus on how such risk cultures can be effectively managed.

The Executive Summary of the report makes the following points:

“First, in contrast to public debates which emphasise values and the need to change mindsets, we learned of risk culture workstreams with more of an emphasis on improving oversight structures and information flows, including performance metrics for risk and good compliance.”

“Second, from our discussions it also appeared that critical issues in risk culture were being played out in the space between what are called first and second lines of defence, suggesting that this distinction, which many take for granted, may not be helpful in advancing the debate about risk culture.”

“Third, improving risk culture was also seen by CROs as a matter of improving the organisational footprint of the risk management function. This was more than just rolling out ERM systems but involved expanding the reach of informal risk processes, information sharing and escalation, and representation on key committees.”

“Fourth, we also heard concerns about a familiar issue – the role of documentation. The argument was that some documentary and evidentiary demands were creating the wrong kind of risk culture. We intend to follow up further on this.”

In the meantime, it is interesting to read that Norman Marks made the following comment last year on the importance of Culture in one of his regular blog posts:

“Culture can be excessively aggressive or passive. Striking and maintaining the right balance is not easy, but is essential to delivering sustained performance, considering risks, and remaining in compliance.”

Over the coming months, we will be investigating this important topic in much more detail and look forward to updating you later in the year with what we discover.

More …

Institute of Risk Management (IRM): http://www.theirm.org/

IRM Risk Culture Guidance Resources: http://www.theirm.org/RiskCulture.html

Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation (CARR): http://www2.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/CARR/home.aspx

Risk Culture in Financial Organisations – Interim Report:  http://www2.lse.ac.uk/researchAndExpertise/units/CARR/pdf/Risk-culture-interim-report.pdf

Norman Marks Blog Post: Questions to ask about GRC – #5: Culture: http://normanmarks.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/questions-to-ask-about-grc-5-culture

Thursday, 3 January 2013

Five critical factors needed for transformational behaviour

Change ManagementFive critical factors needed for transformational behaviour: importance of people in implementing and embedding change.

 

Extract from strategy+business – Ashley Harshak, DeAnne Aguirre, and Anna Brown:

Few organizations have escaped the need for major change in the past decade, as new technologies and global crises have reshaped entire industries. However, the fact that change has become more frequent does not make such changes any easier.

Change is, at its core, a people process, and people are creatures of habit, hardwired to resist adopting new mind-sets, practices, and behaviors. To achieve and sustain transformational change, companies must embed these mind-sets, practices, and behaviors at every level, and that is very hard to do — but it has never been more important.

Some organizations have managed to develop approaches to change management that address change comprehensively. A successful business transformation effort must capture the hearts and minds of people who need to operate differently to deliver the desired results. The good news is that it can be done.

What is Change Management?

Change management is both a capability and a set of interventions that deliver the people-oriented side of a change effort. Successful change management targets leaders but also engages people across the organization, while adjusting key enabling processes such as performance management. It helps employees make the transition to new behaviors, and it helps sustain the benefits of the new post-transformation enterprise.

Most business leaders have come to understand the importance of the people component in implementing and embedding change. According to a survey conducted by Booz & Company of 350 global executives charged with leading major transformation programs, senior leaders now recognize that people initiatives usually spell the difference between success and failure.

However, there was broad consensus among the respondents that this sort of change management is often undertaken too late and too lightly to be effective. To achieve a successful change effort, people issues need to be identified and incorporated in project management plans from the start and then revisited again and again throughout the implementation process to ensure the desired strategic outcome.

The Five Success Factors

Each of the following five key success factors should be considered vital by those designing a change management program. These are the actions that can make change happen — and make it stick. All five should be evident in the program’s implementation.

1. Understand and spell out the impact of the change on people.

A prerequisite to any viable change program is a clear-eyed assessment of the impact it will have on various populations in the organization. This analysis identifies the type and scale of changes affecting each segment of employees (as defined by role or business, for example). This assessment also provides a basis for communicating with the team members about what the change means for them personally — the predominant concern of every employee in a business transformation.

A well-known global energy firm did exactly that when it produced a change impact analysis with a “heat map” illustrating the intensity of change for each group of employees, and a detailed description of the changes each role would need to deliver. As a result, the leadership team was able to focus and redirect the transformation program to address the challenges facing those in the roles most affected. Moreover, project teams identified areas of potential overlap and conflict in the impact of various initiatives. Finally, the analysis informed the plans and sequencing of the overall transformation program and became the basis for communications with managers. In cascade fashion, managers received the message from their supervisors and then delivered it to their teams.

2. Build an emotional and rational case for change.

Many leaders excel at building the rational case for change, but they are less adept in appealing to people’s emotional core. Yet the employees’ emotions are where the momentum for real transformation ultimately lies. Change management communications need to be targeted to each segment of the workforce, and delivered in a two-way fashion that allows people to make sense of the change subjectively.

If you are asking people to adapt to a new reality, they need to understand the emotional case for the change so they can feel truly committed to the transformation. It can’t be presented as another “program of the month” that they will have to live through. Bringing the details of what will change — and what won’t — into the presentation allows leaders to paint a vivid picture of what the change means for employees personally, not only why it benefits the business.

3. Ensure that the entire leadership team is a role model for the change.

Companies start their transformations from the top. Senior executives must be not only “on top” of the change program, but also “in front” of it, modeling the new behaviors they are asking their people to adopt and holding one another accountable for the initiative’s success. When executives talk about creating a performance culture, they must demonstrate through example what that means.

An aligned and committed leadership team is the foundation for any major corporate undertaking. When executives lead by example, the impact can be profound. One senior director found that it was only after he introduced ongoing performance discussions with his direct reports that his team started to hold similar sessions with their own direct reports. This requires consistent attention, but that level of engagement will make the difference between success and failure.

4. Mobilize your people to “own” and accelerate the change.

The blunt truth is that most change initiatives are done “to” employees, not implemented “with” them or “by” them. Although executives are pushing behavior change from the top and expecting it to cascade through the formal structure, an informal culture left to instinct and chance will likely dig in its heels.

To counteract this undermining force, companies should leverage what Booz & Company Senior Partner Jon Katzenbach calls the informal organization — the network of peer-to-peer interactions. People need to be encouraged and motivated to change their behavior by those around them as much as they need incentives from the top.

This does not mean that companies should forgo a centrally driven program with a clear road map that lays out the formal elements of the new organization. But they must not overlook the informal organization either. Pride, commitment, and purpose reside here. If you use powerful emotional motivators, invite employees to contribute ideas and perspectives, and provide the kind of informal support and recognition that makes it easier to take ownership of new behaviors, you can accelerate and intensify the impact of the change initiative.

5. Embed the change in the fabric of the organization.

Sponsors often declare victory too soon, diverting leadership, commitment, and focus from the ongoing effort. To embed the change and ensure that it sticks, you should acknowledge the lessons learned. You also should investigate how to engage and involve employees over the long term and how to institutionalize best practices to capture the full benefit of this change and any future changes.

The human resources function plays a critical role in this process. To enable lasting change, all HR systems, structures, processes, and incentives must be aligned and consistent with the goals of the transformation. You need to articulate clearly the various people-oriented elements of the future organization — not just its structure, but also employee value propositions and individual and team roles, as well as required competencies, skills, and behaviors. Things like performance management, learning and development, workforce strategy, and retention programs are key enablers of the change program.

The challenge is to rethink not only how HR can help people support the change but also how it can contribute to embedding and sustaining the change. This requires HR to understand the business and its long-term requirements as both a strategic partner and a change agent.

Navigating Change Successfully

A comprehensive approach to change management requires all five of these success factors. Together, they enable you to take the necessary steps for change. First, clearly define the business objectives the change is intended to deliver. Next, understand the current organization — its culture, its capabilities, and its experiences (both successful and unsuccessful) with change — and then conduct the change impact analysis and make a clear case for change, including the reasons why change in people’s behavior is needed. The main thrust of the change program follows with a series of tailored interventions that drive change through both formal and informal levers. This should not be a fixed or formulaic methodology but rather one that accelerates success by selecting the most efficient tools and techniques for the specific circumstances of the client organization.

At each step, all five of the success factors should be considered. Indeed, they provide a useful checklist. Have you spelled out the impact of the change on people? Have you built both an emotional and a rational case for change? Is your leadership team — all the members, yourself included — acting as a role model? Are your people “owning” and accelerating the change? And how deeply is the new behavior embedded in the fabric of the organization?

In today’s business environment, change is an imperative. A change management approach such as this can help companies enhance their overall transformation capability, increase the speed of implementation, and improve the probability of success.

More … http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00057?gko=39ed2

Fighting symptoms of corporate decline

businesstransformationminiFighting symptoms of corporate decline: shifting culture using productive, inclusive, and empowering actions.

 

Extract from HBR Blog – Rosabeth Moss Kanter:

How do you know a team, company, or country is on the slippery slope of decline and needs a culture shift? I found nine universal warning signs of change-in-the-wrong direction in research for my book Confidence, which compared downward spirals with the momentum of success. The good news is that they are all reversible. Watching out for these behaviors is the first step toward building better habits.

First, the signs that there is more trouble ahead:

Communication decreases. The first seeds are sown when information stops flowing, People avoid conversation and close their doors. Decisions are made in secret. People mistrust official statements. Gossip substitutes for the full facts.

Criticism and blame increase. People are dressed down in public. They make excuses for themselves and point their fingers at someone else. Scapegoats are sacrificed. Self-doubt is masked by attack. External forces are blamed, personal responsibility avoided.

Respect decreases. Constant criticism makes people feel surrounded by a bunch of losers. They feel that low performance is common, and deadwood is tolerated. Everyone expects the worst of everyone else — and says so.

Isolation increases. People retreat into their own corners or subgroups, suspicious of others and unwilling to engage with them. Withdrawing from contact further isolates them, encouraging others to back away too. Silos harden.

Focus turns inward. People become self-absorbed and lose sight of the wider context — customers, constituencies, markets, or the world. What’s going on inside becomes more important than any external goal.

Rifts widen and inequities grow. Internal rivalries escalate into gang warfare. A few stars become a privileged elite, claiming disproportionate attention, resources, and opportunities. Power differentials and social distance between groups and levels make collaboration difficult. People hoard resources for their own use. The less there is to go around, the greater the temptation to play favorites or get more for one’s own group.

Aspirations diminish. People stop believing that progress is possible. They are willing to settle for mediocrity. They want to minimize risk rather than to look for big improvements. “Defensive pessimism” sets in; that is, lowering expectations to cope with anxiety in risky situations. You might not see absenteeism, but there is “presenteeism,” which means the body is there but the mind is absent.

Initiative decreases. Discredited and demoralized, people become paralyzed by anxiety. Believing that nothing will ever change, people go passive, following routines but not taking initiative even on small things, and certainly not seeking innovation or change. Policies and processes are perceived to be ingrained and inevitable, shutting off new ideas.

Negativity spreads. In an emotional chain reaction, pervasive negativity fuels further decline. The culture permits selfishness, greed, mistrust, disrespect, petty turf battles, and excuses instead of action.

It’s easy to get discouraged by the doom and gloom of downward spirals, as I’ve seen in declining companies, low-performing inner city schools, marriages falling apart, developing countries with wide social divides, and problems with U.S. competitiveness. But I’ve also worked on the opposite: turnarounds that create habits that fuel success. I’ve observed and helped leaders who care about positive relationships set the stage for positive outcomes. Here’s what leaders — official or emergent — do to shift a culture from the behaviors of decline to the habits of success:

Keep communication open and information flowing. Foster widespread problem-solving dialogue. Face facts openly and honestly.

Emphasize personal responsibility. Refuse to listen to attacks on others and ask each person to take responsibility for his or her part of a problem.

Model respect for talent and achievements at every level. Offer frequent public thanks. Praise those who meet high standards while helping poor performers improve (or weeding them out if they don’t).

Convene conversations across groups. Involve diverse cross-cutting teams in problem-solving.

Stress common purpose. Communicate inspiring goals larger than any individual or group. Find a grand challenge to unite people.

Work on reducing inequities and status differences. Require the privileged to mentor and help others. Spread extra resources to many groups, and encourage joint projects or shared service. Provide opportunities for learning and growth.

Raise aspirations. Use small wins to show the potential for bigger successes. Encourage realistic stretch goals and offer people the help to reach them.

Reward initiative. Provide time or small grants to work on new ideas. Make brainstorming a habit.

Reinforce the positive by saying and demonstrating that change is possible. Ignore the voices of negativity.

Leaders can guide productive, inclusive, and empowering actions that build winners’ habits. Even when the signs of decline are all around us, it’s still possible to shift the culture. Heeding the warnings is a good first step.

More … http://blogs.hbr.org/kanter/2012/12/fight-the-nine-symptoms-of-cor.html?

 

 

Managing chaos to generate success

Change ManagementManaging chaos to generate success: power of using generation flux approach to embrace chaos and successfully lead.

 

Extract from Fast Company – Robert Safian:

Generation Flux is a term I coined several months ago, in a Fast Company cover story that explained how the dizzying velocity of change in our economy has made chaos the defining feature of modern business. New companies–even industries–rise and fall faster than ever: Witness Apple, Facebook, and Amazon; witness Research in Motion, Blockbuster, and MySpace; witness the iPad and, yes, cloud computing. Accepted models for success are proving vulnerable, and pressure is building on giants like GE and Nokia, as their historic advantages of scale and efficiency run up against the benefits of agility and quick course corrections. Meanwhile, the bonds between employer and employee, and between brands and their customers, are more tenuous than ever.

Generation Flux describes the people who will thrive best in this environment. It is a psychographic, not a demographic–you can be any age and be GenFlux. Their characteristics are clear: an embrace of adaptability and flexibility; an openness to learning from anywhere; decisiveness tempered by the knowledge that business life today can shift radically every three months or so, as Levie says.

That first article was primarily a career guide, a handbook for navigating work in an era that refuses to settle into a status quo. Yet after the article was published, I got many emails from CEOs and other business leaders who find themselves struggling–some quietly, some candidly–with how to run their organizations amid such tumult. “There’s so much chaos all around,” one wrote. “You can’t prevent the chaos, only respond to it… quickly.” Their overriding concern is simple: Traditional organizational structures no longer seem sufficient.

This is the great challenge of 21st-century leadership. We have grown up with certain assumptions about what works in an enterprise, what the metrics for success are, how we organize and deploy resources. The bulk of those assumptions are wrong now. The world in which we were raised and trained no longer exists. The clarity of words we use to discuss business, standbys like marketplace and competitive advantage, are being redefined and rendered almost meaningless.

In this environment, the examples of companies we once turned to as models for success–Apple, Coca-Cola, Walmart–are less useful. Size and brand awareness no longer provide a competitive moat. “The advantages of long-standing brands, of distribution, of reach–these don’t offer the same leverage,” observes Levie, who has himself exploited this reality in constructing his business. “Thanks to technology, the newcomer may be as well or even better equipped.” In this world of constant change, following a single system or model is foolhardy–the companies that succeed will be nimble and ever-changing.

Twenty years ago, a management professor by the name of Margaret Wheatley published a book called Leadership and the New Science. It was prescient then; it is even more eye-opening now. Her premise: Organizations and society have been structured to match our understanding of the natural world, which goes back to the 17th-century ideas of Sir Isaac Newton. Newton famously posited theories of cause and effect, and referred to our world as a machine–a closed system (set in place by the Great Watchmaker). In Newtonian physics, there is no greater goal than stability. That scientific conclusion helped us to embrace hierarchy and one-size-fits-all models. And our businesses have indeed been constructed for efficiency. Following the example of Henry Ford, we have extended our manufacturing prowess into shipping and logistics. We have used technology to enhance effectiveness, to track data and mine it for new refinements.

Now, however, these traditional business priorities are under strain in profound ways. Wheatley again points to science as a model: to the post-Newtonian study of quantum mechanics and subatomic particles. We now know that cause and effect is not a given in the natural world. Creation comes not from stasis but from unpredictable movement. Chaos is everywhere. One of the more mind-bending paradoxes of quantum physics that Wheatley highlights is the fact that subatomic matter has two forms of being. In something called a double-slit experiment, an electron behaves like a wave when it is observed in one way and like a particle when it is observed another way. Both views are true.

Business today is nothing if not as paradoxical. We require efficiency and openness, thrift and mind-blowing ambition, nimbleness and a workplace that fosters creativity. Organizational systems based on the Newtonian model are not equipped for these dualities.

Generation Flux leaders are the ones who will steer their companies, and modern business, toward more sophisticated models. In today’s chaos, leadership is more critical than ever–but a different kind of leadership. There is no single model of what it will take to succeed now. But drawing on examples from many different kinds of organizations–including the U.S. Army, Foursquare, Nike, Intuit, and a 105-year-old not-for-profit in Texas–we can begin to define the qualities of successful GenFlux leaders. And we can even see the power that comes from a full, open embrace of the challenge. “Companies and people tend to look at chaos as an obstacle, a hurdle,” says Nike CEO Mark Parker. “We look at it as an opportunity: Get on the offense.”

More … http://www.fastcompany.com/3001734/secrets-generation-flux